In 2004, John Con­way and Alexan­der Soifer, each paintings­ing on math­e­mat­ics at Prince­ton Uni­ver­si­ty, sub­mit­ted to the Amer­i­can Math­e­mat­i­cal Month­ly what they believed was once “a brand new international document within the num­ber of phrases in a [math] paper.”

Soifer explains: “On April 28, 2004 … I sub­mit­ted our paper that includ­ed simply two phrases, ‘n2 + 2 can’ and our two draw­ings. [See one of them above.]” The sto­ry then con­tin­ues: “The Amer­i­can Math­e­mat­i­cal Month­ly was once sur­prised, and didn’t know what to do about our new international document of a 2‑phrase arti­cle. Two days lat­er, on April 30, 2004, the Edi­to­r­i­al Assis­tant Mrs. Mar­garet Combs acknowl­edged the receipt of the paper”:

The Month­ly pub­lish­es expo­si­tion of math­e­mat­ics at many lev­els, and it con­tains arti­cles each lengthy and quick. Your arti­cle, how­ev­er, is a little too quick to be a just right Month­ly arti­cle… A line or two of expla­na­tion would actual­ly lend a hand.

Soifer writ­ers: “The similar day on the cof­charge hour I requested John [Con­way], ‘What do you assume?’ His solution was once con­cise, ‘Don’t surrender too eas­i­ly.’ Accord­ing­ly, I answered [to] The Month­ly the similar day”:

I admire­ful­ly dis­agree {that a} quick paper basically—and this paper particularly—simply because of its measurement should be “a little too quick to be a just right Month­ly arti­cle.” Is there a con­nec­tion between quan­ti­ty and qual­i­ty?… We have now posed a tremendous (in our opin­ion) open prob­lem and record­ed two dis­tinct “behold-style” proofs of our advance in this prob­lem. What else is there to provide an explanation for?

Soifer provides: “The Month­ly, appar­ent­ly felt out­gunned, for on Might 4, 2004, the answer got here from The Month­ly’s most sensible gun, Edi­tor-in-Leader Bruce Buddy­ka”:

The Month­ly pub­lish­es two sorts of papers: “arti­cles,” which can be sub­stan­tive expos­i­to­ry papers rang­ing in duration from about six to twen­ty-five pages, and “notes,” which can be quick­er, fre­quent­ly some­what extra tech­ni­cal items (typ­i­cal­ly within the one-to-five web page vary). I will ship your paper to the notes edi­tor if you want, however I be expecting that he’ll no longer be inter­est­ed in it both as a result of its duration and absence of any sub­stan­tial accom­pa­new york­ing textual content. The stan­dard approach during which we use such quick papers in this day and age is as “boxed filler” on pages that would oth­er­smart con­tain a large number of the clean house that pub­lish­ers abhor. For those who’d permit us to make use of your paper in that approach, I’d be hap­py to pub­lish it.

Soifer con­cludes: “John Con­approach and I settle for­ed the ‘filler’, and within the Jan­u­ary 2005 factor our paper was once pub­lished.” Vic­to­ry!

Get more of the back­sto­ry here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Quick­est-Identified Paper Pub­lished in a Seri­ous Math Jour­nal: Two Suc­cinct Sen­tences

John Nash’s Tremendous Quick PhD The­sis: 26 Pages & Two Cita­tions

The Map of Math­e­mat­ics: Ani­ma­tion Presentations How The entire Dif­fer­ent Fields in Math Have compatibility Togeth­er



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here